AIRVI
TRANSPARENCY · LIVE SNAPSHOT

AIRVI Ecosystem Coverage

A living snapshot, not a finished census — how many agents, tools, dashboards, MCP servers, LLMs, and stacks AIRVI has actually cataloged, held up against our best estimate of how many exist. The AIRVI numbers are live, computed fresh on every visit as our own index grows; the real-world estimates are refreshed manually and dated below.

Live numbers generated September 13, 2026

In AIRVI

2,021

1,470 cataloged, 551 indexed

Est. in the wild

~2,000–5,000

as of August 2026
Internal estimate

Coverage

~29% of the conservative estimate

In AIRVI

1,245

973 cataloged, 272 indexed

Est. in the wild

~12,000–47,400

as of August 2026
There's An AI For That

Coverage

Curated & growing

Dashboards

Browse →

In AIRVI

340

285 cataloged, 55 indexed

Est. in the wild

~150–250

as of August 2026
Internal estimate

Coverage

Meets or exceeds our internal estimate

Skills / MCPs

Browse →

In AIRVI

316

271 cataloged, 45 indexed

Est. in the wild

~3,000–10,000

as of August 2026
Glama MCP Registry

Coverage

Curated & growing

In AIRVI

140

122 cataloged, 18 indexed

Est. in the wild

~327–360

as of August 2026
LLM Stats

Coverage

~34% of the conservative estimate

In AIRVI

210

180 cataloged, 30 indexed

Est. in the wild

N/A

as of August 2026
Editorial construct

Coverage

N/A — editorial construct

Methodology

“In AIRVI” counts every row in our database for that category, including bare name/slug stubs captured during bulk research passes (labeled indexed) that haven’t been written up yet — those never appear as public pages until a cataloged entry replaces them, but they do count here as part of the ecosystem we’ve identified. “Est. in the wild” is a range, not a point estimate, because no category here has a true, authoritative census — we’d rather show a defensible range with its source than a precise-looking number we can’t back up. Coverage is calculated against the high end of that range on purpose, so we never overstate how complete we are.

Agents and Dashboards have no public registry to cite, so those ranges are our own order-of-magnitude estimates, marked as such. Stacks are an editorial construct — curated combinations we assemble, not a category that exists independently in the wild — so there’s no real-world denominator and no coverage percentage to compute.